911: The September Magic Show

by Timothy B. Wilson

September 11th, 2009 Today the term "911-Truthers" is being used by the media since terms like "Conspiracy Theory Nut-Jobs" are getting stale. Why? Because these negative labels confuse and disorient the easily programmed populous. And what a magic show we saw. Over and over, video of a plane crashing into a tower with a huge fireball explosion, followed by the video of buildings going down. Classic cause and effect programming. The truth is that jet fuel had nothing to do with the destruction of three world trade centers (WTC1, WTC2 and WTC7) on 911. Three buildings? Yes, three. I bet you were conditioned by this headline: Terrorists Hijack, Crash Planes Jet Fuel Fires Cause Twin Towers' Collapse Have you bought into this HUGE LIE? If so, you're not alone. Why? Because it's downright disturbing to come to grips with high treason, mass murder, and power crazed deception from the leaders of our country, in our beloved "land of the free, home of the brave, apple pie, etc." Well, 911 is about "magic", which is, as defined in John Mulholland's book, "The Art of Illusion", "...the pretended performance of those things which cannot be done. The success of a magician's simulation of doing the impossible depends upon misleading the minds of his audiences. This is done by adding to a performance, details of which the spectators are unaware, and leaving out others which they believe you have not left out. In short, a performance of magic is largely a demonstration of the universal reliability of certain facts of psychology." "If you tell a lie big enough and keep repeating it, people will eventually come to believe it."                    ---- Adolph Hitler Deception is the wicked government leaders' preferred weapon. Big lies, such as the "official 911 story", can be maintained only for such time as the State can shield the people from the political, economic and/or military consequences of the lie. It thus becomes vitally important for the State to use all of its powers to repress dissent, for the truth is the mortal enemy of the lie, and thus the truth is the greatest enemy of the State. First, let's come to an understanding about one thing...U.S. allies (such as Israel) and people within the U.S. military establishment, particularly at the very top, are not opposed to killing Americans, given the right goal. This is a historical fact. Example (1): Operation Northwoods - In 1962, U.S. military leaders designed a plan to conduct terrorist acts against Americans and blame Cuba, to create popular sentiment for invasion of that country. Operation Northwoods included: (a) Plans to shoot down a CIA plane designed to replicate a passenger flight and announce that Cuban forces had shot it down. (b) Creation of military casualties by blowing up a U.S. ship in Guantanamo Bay and blaming Cuba: "...casualty lists in the U.S. newspapers would cause a helpful wave of national indignation," and (c) Development of a "terror campaign" in the Miami and Washington, DC. You can view the actual declassified "Operation Northwoods" documents for yourself by going to: http://whatreallyhappened.com/WRHARTICLES/northwoods.html Example (2): The Bay of Tonkin Lie - In a nutshell, this was a situation in 1964, in The Bay of Tonkin, where a North Vietnamese PT boat allegedly attacked a U.S. warship, creating the excuse for the U.S. government to go full throttle into Vietnam. By that time JFK had conveniently met with an unfortunate death, and so President Johnson could do whatever he wanted. It's what he had wanted to do in Cuba at the Bay of Pigs. When JFK was alive, only 42 Americans had died in Vietnam and he was planning to bring all the troops home. Right after his assassination his plans were reversed. In response to what he described as "open aggression on the open seas," President Johnson ordered U.S. airstrikes on North Vietnam. The airstrikes opened the door to a war that would kill one million Vietnamese and 58,000 Americans and divide the nation along class and generational lines. Again, people within the U.S. military, especially at the very top, have a historical record of not being opposed to killing Americans, given the right goal. Example (3): During Israel's Six Day War in June of 1967, the Liberty, an American Intelligence gathering ship, was mistakenly attacked for 75 minutes by Israeli torpedo boats and aircraft. When four U.S. fighter jets came to protect the Liberty, President Johnson, first through his Defense Secretary Robert McNamara, and secondly first hand, ordered the jets NOT to come to the Liberty's aid. Johnson said that he did not care who was killed or what happened to the ship, he just didn't want his allies embarrassed. Read transcript here. U.S.S. Liberty Memorial web site we read, "The Betrayal of American Veterans" - Americans who volunteer for military service effectively write a blank check, payable to the United States of America for an amount "up to and including my life." The United States, in turn, promises to spend these checks responsibly. That bargain implicitly includes a promise by the United States to protect them and to seek retribution against anyone who harms them. In the case of USS Liberty, The United States has failed to keep its end of the bargain. Fast forward to 2000, and let's check out the Statement of Principles by Project For The New American Century. Note at bottom of that page, Dick Cheney, Donald Rumsfeld, Jeb Bush, Paul Wolfowitz, as some of those behind this project. A project that among other things, needed a new Pearl Harbor in order to accomplish its objectives. Here's a quote from the PNAC web site concerning the transformational nature of their project.... "Further, the process of transformation, even if it brings revolutionary change, is likely to be a long one, absent some catastrophic and catalyzing event - like a new Pearl Harbor" See video about the PNAC here. With just three of many examples cited, can your mind accept the possibility that 911 was planned and pulled off, not by terrorists, but by top U.S. Officials? Too much to swallow? Well, I'm going to explain to you exactly how American leaders, with a secret pact controlling those who follow orders pulled it off. And what were the stakes for doing this? (1) The creation of a fully-funded trillion dollar war that will go on for years against radical Muslims throughout the world. (2) The legitimization of military rule in the U.S. (i.e. Patriot Act and Presidential Directive #51, to control domestic rebellion). (3) The Redistribution of the world's oil resources into the U.S., away from China, Russia and India's growing demands. (4) The entire power structure of planet Earth changed, making the U.S. number one military power (as a military ruled country). So we have Dick Cheney at the top, who hand-picked his "yes men", who in turn, hand-picked their "yes men". With the CIA, FBI, NSA, and other military resources at his disposal, Dick Cheney put his plan into motion as soon as he took office (January, 2001). On the morning of Sept 11th, 2001, Dick Cheney (former U.S. Secretary of Defence under Bush Sr.), from his bunker in Washington D.C., was running his extensive series of war games simulations across the Northeastern United States. These games entailed simulations of planes being crashed into buildings. Coincidence? Hardly. On 9-11 plenty of F-15's were in the air, yet they were purposely diverted from the "real" threats to New York City and Washington D.C.. As total insurance for success, Dick had his F-15 "stand down" order in place, having usurped that power from the otherwise commanding Generals, via his June 2001 memo. Dick's war games involved all kinds of magic tricks to distract Flight Controllers, complete with up to 20 fake blips on their screens. Yes, the CIA can do this at anytime, with complete access to air traffic info in real time. I'm sure Bush Sr. was involved, as former head of the CIA. And so what was a real attack on 911 and what was a simulated attack? Only the master magicians knew for sure. Now before going further, let's read a quote from former U.S. Secretary of Agriculture (under Pres. Eisenhower), Ezra T. Benson. Ezra was strong Constitutionalist as well as a great, God-fearing man: "...wickedness is rapidly expanding in every segment of our society. It is more highly organized, more cleverly disguised, and more powerfully promoted than ever before. Secret combinations lusting for power, gain, and glory are flourishing. A secret combination that seeks to overthrow the freedom of all lands, nations, and countries is increasing its evil influence and control over America and the entire world." (ENSIGN, Nov. 1988, pg. 86). It's been said of the 911 planes, that they were as bumblebees. Go visit a bumblebee hive some time and try to keep your eye on just one bee. You can't do it. You get confused. Think of the 9-11 planes as bumblebees. And when working with cryptology, there's many ways of hiding the truth. Substitute information, omit information, scramble information out of sequence, and add nonsense (random garbage). All four methods were used on 911. Let's look at some clues. BUMBLEBEE CLUE #1 - Few Passengers On The Four Flights: Many have remarked about the short passenger lists on the four 911 jets. You might get a low turnout for a 767 or 757 now and then, but four coast to-coast flights taking off from the East inside of a few minutes of each other, all with short passenger lists (planes 25% full)? That just never happens. That's your first clue. BUMBLEBEE CLUE #2 - Pentagon Crash Site: The first report on NBC said there had been an explosion near the Pentagon heliport. No mention of a plane. By now lots of people have realized there's something very wrong with the story of Flight 77's supposed crash into the Pentagon. What's the problem? The wingspan of a 757 is about 125 feet, with about 35 feet between the two jet engines, on each side of a 17' entry hole, there were windows perfectly intact, prior to a larger area "collapsing" 1/2 hr after the impact. After the smoke cleared, everyone could see the Pentagon, but no one could see plane wreckage. Only one engine was found that matches the size of a Tomahawk missile. The Pentagon is made of masonry - limestone - not steel and glass. The aluminum wings of the plane should have been ripped off and left outside the building. We should have seen wing wreckage, or damage to the building's windows where the wings would have hit, but there was no such wreckage or damage. There were no witnesses or security videos of an airliner hitting the Pentagon. That's odd, since the Pentagon air space is the most monitored and protected in the world. And no fighter jets were scrambled from Andrews Air Force Base (located a few miles from the Pentagon) to take out the supposed airliner during its supposed 40 minute approach. Dozens of "official" photos released by the government of the Pentagon crash site have been proven to be highly "photoshopped". All this Pentagon bogusness is your second clue. BUMBLEBEE CLUE #3 - Dumb & Dumber Pilots: The flying instructors who trained the supposed "suicide" pilots of Flight 77 said they were hopeless. "It was like they had hardly even driven a car." The flight instructors called them, "dumb and dumber," and advised them to quit taking lessons. Yet the Washington Post described the supposed maneuvers of Flight 77 before it hit the Pentagon. The phantom huge jet took a 270 degree hairpin turn to make its target. The Post said Flight 77 had to be flown by expert pilots. Something's wrong here. Dumb and dumber are now expert pilots? That's your third clue. BUMBLEBEE CLUE #4 - Transponders Turned Off: The supposed "hijackers" turned off the transponders which transmit information showing the airline names, flight numbers, and altitude. But the FAA also uses conventional radar, so the "hijackers" must have known the planes were still visible. Why would the "hijackers" shut the transponders off, knowing that NORAD would not be fooled by the trick. In addition to transponders, conventional radar always shows the position of a plane. There's your fourth clue. BUMBLEBEE CLUE #5 - No "HJCK" Codes Sent In the event of a hijacking, all airline pilots are trained to key an emergency four-digit code into their plane's transponder. This would surreptitiously alert air traffic controllers, causing the letters "HJCK" to appear on their screens. The action, which pilots should take the moment a hijack situation is known, only takes seconds to perform. Yet during the hijackings of flights 11, 175, 77, and 93, none of the pilots do this. There's your fifth clue. BUMBLEBEE CLUE #6 - Confusion on Radar Tracks: Some of the flights disappeared from the conventional radar scopes. BUMBLEBEE CLUE #7 - Second WTC Tower Barely Hit: Here's What Really Happened on 911 * All remote detonation devices were set in place in all three WTC buildings few weeks prior to 911. During this time, there were several "fire drills" when employees had to evacuate the buildings. Many employees also reported construction noises, drills, hammers, coming from unoccupied floors a few weeks prior to 911. There were also new guards placed near the elevators 24/7 for some reason, just prior to 911. * On Thursday, September 6, 2001, bomb sniffing dogs were abruptly removed from the trade towers. * Over the weekend of Sept 8 & 9, 2001, the south tower was "powered down" for about 36 hours, from the 50th floor and above. This disabled all security cameras and security locks while many "engineers" were seen coming and going from the building. * Overseeing all this unusual activity was Marvin Bush, the President's younger brother. Marvin was a principal for the company that provided security for the World Trade Centers up until 911. A company named Securacom. * Ben Fountain, 42, a financial analyst with Fireman's Fund, on 911 was coming out of the Chambers Street Station, headed for his office on the 47th floor of the south tower. He was quoted by People Magazine, Sept. 12, 2001 saying, "How could they let this happen? They knew this building was a target. Over the past few weeks we'd been evacuated a number of times, which is unusual. I think they had an inkling something was going on." * Two Boeing 767's were secured and painted up to look like United Airlines jets.  Each plane had remote controls installed, courtesy of Northrop Grumman Global Hawk technology, which in April of 2001 had flown an unmanned Boeing 737 from from Edwards Air Force Base in California to the Royal Air Force base at Edinburgh, South Australia.  Call those planes "Pseudo Flights 11 & 175" and leave them parked at a military airfield for the moment. *  The number of the passengers on each flight was kept artificially low that day.  Easy to do.  Just monkey with the airline computers and show the fights full so no more tickets are sold.  Include some of your own operatives in each flight, maybe. * After the planes are in the air, the transponders must be shut down.  There's a few ways to do this, but the simplest is this:  Have one of the NORAD insiders call the pilots and say: "This is the North American Aerospace Defense Command.  There is a national emergency.  We are under terrorist attack.  Turn off your transponder and maintain radio silence. Repeat. Turn off your transponder and maintain radio silence.  Here is your new flight plan...  Proceed on bearing __________ to _________________ [name] military air base, or in the case of flight 93, to Hopkins Int. Airport in Cleveland, OH." *  The pilots then turn off their transponders.  Then FAA insiders lose the information which identifies the airline, the flight number, and the altitude of the planes.  Of course the planes can still be seen on conventional radar, but the planes are just nameless blips now.  *  What did the radar show of the planes' flight paths?  We'll never see the real records, for sure.  But in the spy movies, when the spy wants to lose a tail, he gets a double to lead the tail one way while the spy goes the other.  If I were designing "Operation Pearl", I'd do that:  As each of the original jets is flying, another jet is sent to fly just above or below it, at the same latitude and longitude.  The blips of the two planes merge on the radar scopes.  The blips merge, just like the little bees you're watching outside the hive.  The original planes proceed to the military airfield and air traffic control is thoroughly confused, watching the wrong blips. *  A military 767, "Pseudo Flights 11, decked out to look like an American Airlines passenger jet, except for no windows, is remotely flown into the first WTC tower. *  The second 767 is remotely flown as "Pseudo Flights 175." It is decked out to look like a United airlines passenger jet, except it had no windows,  and is flown into the second tower.  And check out the incinerary missile, flying ahead of the fireball. Cool eh? In every video from every angle, you will see the unmistakable white trail from a rocket jet flying way ahead of the crash area. Also on every video, including the video of the first plane hitting, you will see a brief "flash". This is the flash of the incinerary rocket being fired a fraction of a second before the planes hit the buildings. Why did "Pseudo Flight 175" almost miss the second tower?  Because the remote operators were used to smaller, more maneuverable craft, not a big stubborn 767 full of fuel.  The operators brought that jet in on a tight circle and almost blew it because those jets do hairpin turns like the Queen Mary.  They brought it in too fast and too close to do the job right and just hit the corner of the tower. *  The missiles were mounted in pods underneath each Boeing 767. (see 1 min. video). The missiles fired insure the spectacular ignition of all that jet fuel coming through the buildings. The second crash created the largest fireball ever! Really, fantastic for all the cameras fixed on the towers!  Beautiful!  Everyone has pictures of that fireball!  At the trade towers, with all that jet fuel burnt up on the outside of the buildings, what was burning on the insides? How about a small amount of residual jet fuel, office furniture, computers, and phones (mostly plastic/metal based), acoustical ceiling tiles, and office-grade carpet with its rubber backing. The lack of highly combustible materials in the towers resulted in slow-burning fires with thick, black smoke (1200 degrees Fahrenheit at best. By the way, steel beams do not fatigue or warp with less than several hours of 2600 degree heat applied). These fires were about to be extinguished by Firefighters who had climbed 70 to 80 stories in about 40 minutes. One of these Firefighter's radio messages was recorded, saying, "I think we can get this fire knocked out with a couple of lines." Oh yes, America's finest, strongest, best-trained Firemen would have put out those fires within three to four hours. You can be certain of that. Thermate-th13 charges (which instantly melts/cuts steel into glowing molten) are set off from top to bottom of the buildings. Dozens of people, including NYC Firemen are on camera, claiming they heard "explosions" all over building, including in the lower levels. The familiar, "pop, pop, pop" of demolition charges were reported to have been heard just prior to the buildings coming down. *  The HiThe HiEx Teleblaster II is an example of a high-tech blast initiation system that eliminates the need for detonation wires. Packages of explosives could be installed on nearly every floor, in the areas used by maintenance personnel. Each package would have a battery powered radio link that connected it to the main computer. This master computer would be able to detonate specific packages of explosives at specific times simply by sending signals to the packages. After determining that the airplane hit the 77th floor of the South Tower, the master computer would be set to detonate the explosives on the 77th floor, and then 250 milliseconds later the explosives on the 76th floor, then then 180 milliseconds later the explosives on the 75th floor, etc. On every video of the demolition, many "squibs" are seen many floors below the top to bottom demolition clouds. Squibs are 100 mph focalized, horizontal super explosions. See video clips of the 911 squibs HERE. *  Another remote controlled cruise missile hit the Pentagon, in the name of Flight 77. *  Eyewitnesses are a dime a dozen.  Trusted media whores "witness" the Pentagon hit and claim it was an American Airlines Boeing 757, Flight 77.  Reporters lie better than lawyers. *  On the morning of 911, Cleveland's Hopkins Airport is COMPLETELY EVACUATED on the premise of terrorist attacks. Meanwhile, the 221 people from Flights 11, 175, and 77, now at a military airfield near Cleveland, Ohio, were driven a short distance to Hopkins Airport in Cleveland, and all loaded onto Flight 93, which has safely landed there.  Now Flight 93 has a total of 265 people on board, including 25 flight attendants and 8 pilots. *  Flight 93 takes off for a destination unknown. The obvious objective was to control ALL the passengers from ALL four flights. The best way to insure that with no witnesses getting away, with no witnesses calling on their cell phones, was to confiscate their cell phones right off the bat (phones confiscated by armed personnel on each plane when the "national emergency" is first announced). After herding the passengers and crew from flights 11, 175 and 77 onto 93, flight 93 was flown to a secluded government location, with few "mercenary" type personnel. This location was the end of the road for all 265 of the unfortunate victims. I would bet that ALL the passengers and crew from all four flights were cremated to destroy all their physical evidence, dental records, etc. Ashes tell no tales. Ahead of time, the Shanksville crash site was completely faked and sealed off to the press. A hole was pre-dug and some plane parts and garbage was thrown in. A hero story was concocted. Fake phone calls had been made (cell phones don't work on airliners at high altitudes). A photo of some military ordinance exploding was snapped in the area, and a Shanksville woman was paid well to lie about grabbing her camera and snapping it herself after hearing a noise outside. The County Coroner reported he found no human remains at the alleged crash site. "Not a drop of blood."  The plane that was 93 is destroyed in an unknown location.  The other three original Boeings (Flights 11, 175, 77) still exist, for as of 2005, an FAA report shows their tail numbers "in service" and the tail number of flight 93 "destroyed". You see, the tail numbers on a plane are NOT the flight numbers of a plane. A few months after 911, President Bush reported that he had seen the first plane hit the building on TV. This had to have been a closed circuit TV in the Presidential limo, and seen just before the President went into the school to read to the children. Now how could President Bush have been watching a video of the first plane hit when the only video of the first plane hitting wasn't released until 9/12. Again, the answer is "closed circuit TV". A private view from cameras set up beforehand in NYC. No wonder that 20 minutes later, when a secret service man whispered into Bush's ear, "A second plane hit the other trade tower. We're under attack." that President Bush acted all dumbfounded (and poorly acted, by the way), and did absolutely nothing. Correction. The President did do something. He continued to read, "My Pet Goat" to the school children. And 20 minutes later he casually chatted outside the school for about 15 more minutes before driving away. Why? Because he knew there was not a third airliner bearing down on him at the school (which would have been a high probability if terrorists were really attacking America). REAL HIJACKERS WOULD HAVE... ...expected NORAD would be onto them in 19 minutes following detection of a problem. Surely this is Hijackology 101. Real hijackers with "an incredible degree of organization or skill" would not have taken jets from Boston to hit New York, and given the NORAD 30 minutes and 50 minutes, respectively, to intercept them. Real hijackers would not have taken a jet from Dulles and meandered all the way to Ohio and back again before hitting the Pentagon. Real hijackers would have hijacked planes from Kennedy or LaGuardia to hit the WTC towers shortly after take-off and struck like lightning while the planes were close to their targets, before anyone had a chance to react. Real hijackers would have hijacked a plane from National, Baltimore-Washington, or Dulles airports and hit the Pentagon shortly after take-off and struck like lightning while the plane was close to its target and before anyone had a chance to react. Real hijackers would have believed they had, at the very most, a 19-minute window of opportunity before NORAD interception. Fighter pilots are trained to scramble in under five minutes. They waste no time getting from the barracks to their jets, and are ready for takeoff in a matter of seconds. It's only 10 seconds from power-up to takeoff, and 2.5 minutes to reach airliner cruising altitude. An F-15 can travel the distance between New York City and Washington D.C. in under eight minutes. Hmmmmmm. And some of the so-called "terrorists" believed they'd have an 80-minute window of opportunity, as NORAD supposedly gave them on September 11? Hardly. There were no terrorists involved with 911, other than the great terrorist Dick Cheney, in charge of the day. Again, there were no hijackers on 911. And believing that NORAD tried to protect us from hijackers, but was bested by their superior hijacker strategy, is akin to taking professional wrestling seriously. On 911, incriminating Enron records were destroyed in WTC7. Never heard of it? Well, that's the 47 story building, not hit by a plane, that just fell into its own footprint in 6 seconds at 5:20 p.m. Free fall speed is the speed objects fall, regardless of their weight. Galileo, the "father of modern science" taught such laws of physics back in the 1600's. Now Larry Silverstien had purchased WTC1, WTC2 and WTC7 just a few months prior to 911. He immediately took out "terrorist insurance" and was able to collect 7 billion on his 3.5 billion policy on his three buildings, because his lawyers argued that two planes equals two terrorist incidents. Thus he collect twice. Larry is also the guy who on camera a few months after 911 said regarding WTC7, "...there was such a terrible loss of life, we decided to 'pull it'." Now "pull it" is a term only used to describe the controlled demolition of buildings. Wow, those building demo guys sure worked fast to get that 47 story building down by 5:20 p.m. on 911. Through all that chaos, in just a few hours (instead of the required few weeks), they planned it out, got hundreds of charges set in place, and then, prior to the evacuation of the building, kept out of the way of the Mayor's 911 command and control center people (set up there to command and control the chaos of 911, or more like the detonation of the twin towers). And then by 5:20 p.m., down comes WTC7 to destroy all the detonation center evidence. WTC7 was only the third sky scraper in the history of the world to "collapse" due to fire. The first two were WTC1 and WTC2. The horrific "crime scene" of ground zero was cleaned up in record time. Trucks were loaded with steel beams that had been conveniently cut by the Thermate-th13 charges into 30' lengths. Perfect for loading onto trucks, which ran 24 hours a day for several weeks. Any truck driver caught taking even a short break along the designated route was immediately terminated. All the steel was shipped off to smelting plants in China. No investigation of the steel was ever made. In fact, the "911 Commission", set up to investigate 911, was not even formed until over 400 days after 911. It was headed by Henry Kissinger. Every effort was made to just blame everything on Osama Bin Laden and his gang of terrorists. According to the Commission, the jet fuel from hijacked planes had brought the towers down. As a result of 911, President Bush was given power by Congress to hack away at our Constitutional rights with "The Patriot Act". That act was quickly passed through Congress in the wee hours of the morning, just a few weeks after 911. Mostly unread by Congress. The Patriot Act had to have been written long before 911, due to its complexity, length, and the President's busy post 911 schedule. In November of 2001, a video was conveniently "found" by the U.S. military. It was released and broadcast on TV. Everyone was told the video was of Osama Bin Laden, taking credit for 911. Anyone with half a brain can see the guy in the video, with a much wider head and nose than Osama, was an impostor. The video was more fake evidence to blame 911 on imaginary terrorists. In May of 2008, more " Presidential Directives" were signed into law, allowing any American citizen to be named as "an enemy combatant." Now any citizen can have his or her property seized, and his person removed, with no defense allowed. Many good American Muslims lost their rights and were unlawfully imprisoned soon after 911. Now many good American non-Muslims are just as vulnerable. Why? because the whole of America can now be considered a "terrorist battlefield", wherein we lose our civil liberties. In conclusion, once again these are the stakes for pulling off 911 in front of a nation all too willing to be fooled. (1) The creation of a fully-funded trillion dollar war that will go on for years against radical Muslims throughout the world. (2) The legitimization of military rule in the U.S. (3) The Redistribution of the world's oil resources to the U.S., away from China and India's staggering oil demands. (4) The entire power structure of planet Earth changed, making the U.S. number one regardless of debt. Here's a 4.5 minute video that explains how tall buildings really fall: http://www.you-tube.com/watch?v=VTehya0r1hw CONCLUSION: I don't know about you, but to me, the above evidence is overwhelming. So many undisputed facts are here on the table, that only with a deep level of denial can we say that a terrorist in a cave on the other side of the world pulled off 911. No, the evidence points directly to the top of the U.S. government. They had the motive, the opportunity, and the means. And we do know from experience, that historically, most men abuse power. It's been said that power corrupts, and that absolute power corrupts absolutely. No truer words were ever spoken.